| 肖艳炜,高怡静,李继红,林凯颖,郑亚先,王蓓蓓.英美电力市场用户及调度成本覆盖的思考与启示[J].电力需求侧管理,2018,20(6):61-64 |
| 英美电力市场用户及调度成本覆盖的思考与启示 |
| Reflection and enlightenment on customer and dispatch cost coverage of British and American electricity markets |
| 投稿时间：2018-08-02 修订日期：2018-10-08 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-1831.2018.06.016 |
| 中文关键词: 电力市场 成本覆盖 辅助服务 |
| 英文关键词: electricity market cost coverage auxiliary service |
| 基金项目:国家电网公司科技项目“省级电力现货市场运营推演平台研究与开发”(52110118000A) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2111 |
| 全文下载次数: 874 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以英国电力库时期、NETA时期和美国PJM时期电力市场为例，分析对比三者在用电侧和调度的成本覆盖情况，并且分别从市场运营特点的整体性和3种交易模式在交易和费用制度的繁复程度上、市场的组织形式上、价格的稳定和导向性上、市场运行的透明度上的优劣势进一步分析不同电力市场的运营模式。最后结合我国的实际情况，提出我国电力市场建设方面的相关建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| POOL,NETA and PJM electricity markets are taken as examples to analyze the cost coverage in the process of electricity production. In the part of cost coverage, the cost generation and corresponding way of cost coverage is analyzed from two aspects: user and dispatch. Then the overall characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the three transaction modes form the perspectives of the complexity of the transaction and charging system, the organization of the market, then stability and guidance of the price, and the transparency of the market operation are analyzed respectively. At last, on the basis of the research, the related suggestions are given, combined with the national conditions in China. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |