| 高怡静,魏路平,林凯颖,郑亚先,王蓓蓓,朱炳铨.基于电力生产环节的英美电力市场成本覆盖对比分析[J].电力需求侧管理,2018,20(5):60-64 |
| 基于电力生产环节的英美电力市场成本覆盖对比分析 |
| Cost coverage comparison analysis of British and American electricity markets based on the electricity production |
| 投稿时间：2018-07-19 修订日期：2018-08-14 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-1831.2018.05.015 |
| 中文关键词: 电力市场 成本覆盖 PJM NETA 电力库 |
| 英文关键词: electricity market cost coverage PJM NETA electric power pool |
| 基金项目:国家电网公司科技项目“省级电力现货市场运营推演平台研究与开发”（52110118000A） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2194 |
| 全文下载次数: 1140 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在电力市场化改革进程中，欧美国家成熟的电力市场运营对我国电力市场建设有重要的借鉴经验。从电力生产成本覆盖的角度，以英国电力库时期、NETA时期和美国PJM时期电力市场为例，在简单介绍3种电力市场模式结构的基础上，深入分析对比三者在电力生产环节——发电侧、输电侧、变电和配电侧的成本覆盖情况，以宏观介绍和微观比较相结合的方式阐述在不同时期及市场环境下的电力市场交易模式与规则。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the process of electricity market reform, the market construction of American and European electricity markets can provide important reference value for China. POOL, NETA and PJM electricity markets are taken as the examples to analyze the cost coverage in the process of electricity production. In the part of market composition, the trading mechanism of three markets are explained from a macro perspective. In the part of cost coverage, the cost generation and corresponding way of cost coverage is analyzed from three aspects：generation, transmission and distribution. The overall introduction and detailed comparisons from different aspects are combined to explain the electricity market models and rules under the different periods and market environment. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |